Poll description
Vote for features and things you would like me to work on soon in CardboardToPC.
Choices (in individual preference order)
- Video Streaming
- Virtual Room Support (This would allow walking in real life to control the game, And, In the somewhat distant future, potentially even hand recognition) (Please add more choices for whatever you want, SFW/non-rude, please. I want this to be accessible anywhere, And not get banned from schools or works.)
- Additional VR Device Support (make a new choice for which one you prefer)
- Virtual Desktop Emulation
- iOS Support (Donations will be needed for me to pay for the iOS App Store License, Which is 100$. However, A version could easily be released, It just would only be usable on jail broken devices, Until II received enough donations to buy the license.)
Winning set of choices
The apparent winner of this poll was the set of choices ( 1,1,2,4,5 ):
- Video Streaming
- Video Streaming
- Virtual Room Support (This would allow walking in real life to control the game, And, In the somewhat distant future, potentially even hand recognition) (Please add more choices for whatever you want, SFW/non-rude, please. I want this to be accessible anywhere, And not get banned from schools or works.)
- Virtual Desktop Emulation
- iOS Support (Donations will be needed for me to pay for the iOS App Store License, Which is 100$. However, A version could easily be released, It just would only be usable on jail broken devices, Until II received enough donations to buy the license.)
|
Preference matrix
There are 1 possible sets of 5 choices
that can be formed by selecting from the 5 choices. Of these,
6 sets were considered thoroughly, comparing against
the 6 nearby (similar) sets that differ
in just one choice.
This is the voting preference matrix,
reporting maximal valid proportional preferences.
Fractional digits indicate nonproportional preferences, which
help break ties in proportional preference.
| | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
|---|
| 1. (1,1,2,4,5) |
|
- | 2.2 |
2.3 |
3.5 |
7.7 |
7.7 |
|---|
| 2. (1,1,2,3,4) |
|
0.6 |
- | 2.5 |
0.6 |
6.6 |
6.6 |
|---|
| 3. (1,1,2,3,5) |
|
0.4 |
2.3 |
- | 3.5 |
6.6 |
6.6 |
|---|
| 4. (1,1,3,4,5) |
|
0.3 |
2.2 |
0.3 |
- | 5.5 |
5.5 |
|---|
| 5. (1,2,3,4,5) |
|
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
- | 0 |
|---|
| 6. (1,2,3,4,5) |
|
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0 |
- |
|---|
Pairwise comparison
You can compare any two sets of choices.
Just enter the numbers of the choices (from 1 to 5) in each set, with the
numbers of one set's choices in the left column and the numbers of the other's
in the right column.
Nonproportional poll
The following gives the details of how the poll
would have resulted if run on single choices, without
proportional representation. This hypothetical
poll defines the “individual preference
order” used above.
Ranking of the choices
Winning choices are shown in bold.
Module for algorithm minimax not valid
