Supervisor: Nix Election Committee <>
Announced end of poll:
Actual time poll closed:
This is a test poll.
Actual votes cast: 450
Number of winning choices:
This poll implements proportional representation. The best-candidate criterion is used to identify each voter's preferred set of choices.
Condorcet completion rule:    (What is this?)
Minimax
CIVS Ranked Pairs
Schulze/Beatpath
MAM
Condorcet-IRV
Bottom-2 Runoff
Proportional

Poll description

See the result announcement for more context.

Choices (in individual preference order)

  1. Ericson2314
  2. roberth
  3. Gabriella439
  4. jtojnar
  5. tomberek
  6. winterqt
  7. fpletz
  8. cafkafk
  9. phaer
  10. lovesegfault
  11. yu-re-ka
  12. asymmetric
  13. getchoo
  14. Scrumplex
  15. proofconstruction
  16. doronbehar
  17. nyabinary
  18. Infinidoge
  19. mschwaig
  20. numinit
  21. kloenk
  22. linsui
  23. djacu

Winning set of choices

The apparent winner of this poll was the set of choices ( 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 ):

  1. Ericson2314
  2. roberth
  3. Gabriella439
  4. jtojnar
  5. tomberek
  6. winterqt
  7. fpletz

Preference matrix

There are 245157 possible sets of 7 choices that can be formed by selecting from the 23 choices. Of these, 8 sets were considered thoroughly, comparing against the 113 nearby (similar) sets that differ in just one choice.

This is the voting preference matrix, reporting maximal valid proportional preferences. Fractional digits indicate nonproportional preferences, which help break ties in proportional preference.

  12345678
1. (1,2,3,4,5,6,7)   -0.184 0.213 57.174 58.2 74.214 179.236 201.239
2. (1,2,3,4,5,6,8)   0.153 -0.209 57.192 58.195 170.213 180.237 227.241
3. (1,2,3,5,6,7,8)   0.14 0.137 -57.163 58.165 170.202 171.203 190.212
4. (1,2,3,4,5,7,8)   0.132 0.145 0.19 -0.187 0.177 179.225 198.233
5. (1,2,3,4,6,7,8)   0.171 0.165 0.215 0.184 -128.204 116.236 174.231
6. (1,2,4,5,6,7,8)   0.116 0.146 0.179 0.165 0.183 -0.203 186.218
7. (1,3,4,5,6,7,8)   0.142 0.129 0.177 0.151 0.13 0.185 -140.187
8. (2,3,4,5,6,7,8)   0.143 0.121 0.167 0.155 0.121 0.176 0.184 -

Pairwise comparison

You can compare any two sets of choices. Just enter the numbers of the choices (from 1 to 23) in each set, with the numbers of one set's choices in the left column and the numbers of the other's in the right column.

Set 1Set 2

1,2,3,4,5,6,7 vs. 1,2,3,5,6,7,8

Strong (proportional) preference: tie, 0 to 0

Weak (nonproportional) preference: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 is preferred by 213 to 140

Note: Nonproportional preferences are relevant only if there is a tie in proportional preferences.


Nonproportional poll
The following gives the details of how the poll
             would have resulted if run on single choices, without
	     proportional representation. This hypothetical
	     poll defines the “individual preference
	     order” used above.
Ranking of the choices


Winning choices are shown in bold.
Module  for algorithm minimax not valid